A small modular reactor (SMR) is a factory-built nuclear reactor small
enough to be transported to site.
Like all nuclear reactors SMR's produce and control the release of energy
from splitting the very large unstable atoms of certain elements into
smaller more stable atoms.
The smaller atoms require less energy to exist and the excess energy is
released in the form of heat.
The released heat is used, most often, to generate electricity but may
also be used for industrial processes.
Small Modular Reactors Come in Several Designs
The use of Small Modular Nuclear Reactors (SMR's) is being actively
suggested as a means to provide base-load electrical power at sites of
former coal-burning power generation stations here in Australia.
Currently, there are no licensed designs, or constructed or operating SMRs
in Australia,or in any Organisation for Economic Co-operation and
Development (OECD) countries.
There are 14 individual OECD designs that meet the
definition of an SMR and are considered by the World Nuclear Association
to be in “near term deployment – development well advanced”.
SMR's should have most, if not all, of the following features:
standardised power plant infrastructure with a small physical
footprints, small size so they can be transported to site
factory built identical self contained modular units, rather than
custom-designed
some designs are capable of a “daisy chain” configuration - running
multiple cores in one power plant
small electrical output up to 35-350 Megawatts
from 1 Megawatt 2/3rd is used for non-residental purposes and 1/3rd
for residential use
based on above 1 Megawatt from a SMR translates to very roughly
about 20,000 homes
safety zone reduced from about 15km to 2km, so can be built nearer
urban centres
more efficient fuel usage and less highly radioactive waste
simplified design, fewer components, less piping
inherent reactor passive cooling,in the case of power failure, so
many designs lack a containment structure
some designs cannot be refueled, so no refueling safety risk but you
end up with a throw away reactor after maybe 30 years
Slow reactors that use a “moderator” to make the nuclear reactions
more efficient, need a specific fuel and run at lower temperatures.
They produce some very radioactive long-lived waste.
Fast reactors that do not use a “moderator”, are less efficient but
can run on a greater range of fuels and run at very high temperatures.
The high temperatures can convert some waste into fuel. They produce
less very radioactive long-lived waste.
SMR's rely on two critical components: fuel and coolant.
There are numerous, diverse SMR designs employing new fuel
types/configurations and innovative coolants.
Innovative Fuels
most commonly and in most SMR's regular, small "barrel-shaped"
pellets of fuel are placed into pipes (called "rods") that can be
raised, lowered,re-ordered, removed or replaced as required
but some SMR's designs require more complex fuel -"layered
spheres", "pebbles" or "prismatic blocks"
some of these fuels are actually "mixed" in the coolant in a
sort of fuel/coolant slurry
TRISO, or tri-structural isotropic particle fuel is one of the
most popular options. TRISO particles contain uranium, enclosed in
ceramic and carbon-based layers. This keeps the fuel contained,
keeping all the products of fission reactions inside and allowing
the fuel to resist corrosion and melting.
Other reactors use HALEU: high-assay low-enriched uranium. Most
nuclear fuel used in commercial reactors contains between 3% and
5% uranium-235. HALEU, on the other hand, contains between 5% and
20% uranium-235, allowing reactors to get more power in a smaller
volume.
Innovative Coolants
Water
Water-cooled SMR's are the most developed designs and the most
likely to be promoted if a short development time is required
SMR's that employ water as a coolant generally suffer from the
same safety issues as large nuclear reactors
in double loop designs, one coolant loop is inside the reactor
and goes to a heat exchanger where a second physically separated
loop is heated to steam and sent to the electricty generator
in single loop designs; a single loop goes both inside and
outside the; reactor -there is no physical separation; leak
potential of radioactive contamination exiting the reactor
enclosure
efficiency can be increased by raising temperatures and
pressures through at a considerable increase in materials cost
Gas
large qualtities of helium or carbon dioxide need to be cooled
quickly
uses a direct Brayton cycle gas turbine in a gas stream
operating at up to 750°C. for high thermal efficiency
high temperature requires heat resistant fuels: composite
ceramic fuel, advanced fuel particles, or ceramic-clad actinide
compounds.
core reactor configurations involve pin or plate-based fuel
assemblies or prismatic blocks.
Molten Salt
liquid fuel - salt and fuel are mixed and circulate like a
slurry
uranium tetrafluoride (UF4) or thorium tetrafluoride
(ThF4),dissolved in molten fluoride salt
self regulating -temperature and reactivity correlate negatively
so when the temperature goes up in the reactor, the number of
nuclear fissions goes down.
works at low pressure
salt will solidify if not kept very hot all the time
high grade heat can be used to make hydrogen or for industrial
processes
special alloys need to overcome corrosion risk
refueling obscured by the opaque coolant
coolant can flow over solid fuel like other reactors or fissile
materials can be dissolved directly into the primary coolant so
that the fission directly heats the salt
Molten Metal
molten sodium or molten lead or molten lead/bismuth
will solidify if cooled
high operating temperatures facilitate use of greater range of
fuels
high temperatures may be used for industrial processes rather
than just electricity generation
Uranium-235 (U235) is the primary fission element (nuclear
fuel) across all 14 possible reactor designs.
Australia has abundant uranium reserves, including the world’s largest
deposit at Olympic Dam.
The coolant is used to transfer heat and keep the reactor temperture
within safe levels.
The advanced development SMRs are categorised by coolant type as
below...
SMR #1 - Boiling Water Reactor (BWR) 300Megawatts
has a reactor core that heats water, which then boils and turns
into steam directly within the reactor vessel.
this steam is used to drive a turbine generator to produce
electricity.
direct production of steam within the reactor vessel.
a single-loop system where the reactor coolant also serves as
the steam source.
use of enriched uranium as uranium oxide pellets as fuel.
any fuel leak can make the water radioactive and that
radioactivity can reach the turbine and the rest of the coolant
loop
efficiency up 35%
Boiling Water Reactor
SMR #2 - High Temperature Gas-cooled Reactor (HTGR)
80 Megawatts
uses a gas, typically helium, as the coolant.
these reactors operate at high temperatures, which makes them
efficient for electricity generation and suitable for industrial
process heat applications.
use of graphite as a moderator (to slow down neutrons, allowing
the fission chain reaction to continue).
helium is used as a coolant because it does not absorb neutrons
and remains chemically inert.
huge volume of gas must be cooled before looping through system
again
some designs cannot be re-fueled
very high operating temperatures, which can exceed 850°C.
the heated gas spins a gas turbine which requires a critical and
inaccessible magnetic bearing in the heated gas flow
is a type of nuclear reactor that uses pressurised water as both
a coolant and a neutron moderator.
the primary loop of high-pressure water transfers heat from the
reactor core to a secondary loop, where steam is generated to
drive turbines.
use of pressurised water to prevent boiling within the reactor
core.
a two-loop system separating the reactor coolant from the steam
generator.
higher pressure and temperature result in efficiency up to about
35%
expensive piping due to heat and pressure, higher cost of
components
similar safety issues to existing Large Water Cooled Reactors
reactor vessel visible during refueling
uses uranium oxide pellets
similar to Boiling Water Reactor but two water loops (one inside
and one outside with a heat exchanger)
Pressurised Water Reactor
SMRs #12, 13, 14 - Sodium or Lead or Lead-Bismuth-cooled Fast
Nuclear Reactor (Liquid Metal FNR) 100-345 Megawatts
uses liquid sodium as the coolant.
Sodium FNRs operate at high temperatures and use fast neutrons
to sustain the nuclear reaction, which allows for more efficient
fuel utilisation and the ability to burn some long-lived
actinides.
these reactors can be used for process heat applications.
liquid sodium as the coolant, which has excellent heat
transfer properties.
fast neutron spectrum, they do not use a moderator.
high operating temperatures allow for efficient electricity
generation. 550-800°C
opaque coolant so no visibility on re-fueling
less long lived radioactive waste
sodium cooled uses metallic UZr with minor actinides; and the
lead-cooled SMR uses mononitride-mixed fuel (UN-PuN)
can use "spent fuel" from conventional nuclear reactor waste
sodium reacts violently if it comes in contact with water
operates at low pressures
circulated by natural convection
Liquid Metal Cooled Reactor
Nuclear Hydrogen Production
High-temperature electrolysis of hydrogen is contentious, “*red hydrogen”,
made through the use of nuclear energy, is not “green” as radioactive
waste is a bi-product.
Thermochemical water splitting uses high temperatures—from the heat of
nuclear power reactions—and chemical reactions to produce hydrogen and
oxygen from water.
Thermochemical water splitting processes use high-temperature heat
(500°–2,000°C) to drive a series of chemical reactions that produce
hydrogen.
The chemicals used in the process are reused within each cycle, creating
a closed loop that consumes only water and produces hydrogen and oxygen
Four chemical cycles cycles,appear to have some merit; namely Cu-Cl,
V-Cl, Mg-Cl and S-I cycles, with efficiencies of 52.6%, 69%, 63.63% and
46.9%.
In comparison using electrolysis of water from renewable sources can
have efficiencies as high as 70%
So comparable to that of the; simple electrolysis of water. All
processes entail a very large input of energy.
At 100% efficiency it would take 9 litres of pure water and 50-55Kw of
electricty to produce 1 litre of hydrogen fuel.
The average Australian household consumes 18Kw of electricity per day.
Only practical if "waste" heat is used for hydrogen production ie. an
additional benefit of an otherwise unused resource
Given the high temperatures required for thermochemical "red" hydrogen
production is would seem that only gas-cooled and molten salt cooled
reactors could supply sufficiently temperature.
Both gas-cooled and molten salt-cooled systems still require a long
prototype and testing timelines.
Heavy Industry Use
Gas cooled molten salt cooled and molten metal cooled reactors seem to
be the only SMR designs capable of waste heat output in the range of
800-850°C
This may be useful in intense non-electrical industries, such as
chemical manufacturing, cement/lime production, primary metals
manufacturing, synthetic fuels and ammonia.
What temperatures would be needed ?
cement/lime 1370°C
copper
1083°C
lead
327°C
zinc
419°C
iron 1200-1530°C
gold
1063°C
stainless steel 1363°C
aluminium 659°C
ammonia via Haber-Bosch process 400-450°C
Practically speaking using waste heat from SMRs for industrial processes
would be a win/win situation.
It is difficult to determine which chemical processes would suit the use
of waste heat but this would seem to be the most likely application.
For lead, zinc, and ammonia waste heat seems to be a possibility.
Aluminium production requires electricity so that is not practical.
For all other listed processes the heat requirement substantially
exceeds the maximum waste heat temperature.
To achieve temperatures above waste heat maximums would necessitate the
addition of electrical energy most likely electric arc furnaces - not a
win/win.
Not mentioned in sources? Maybe using excess heat of SMRs for
desalination of sea water as insurance for our climate-affected major
food growing areas.
As Base-load Power
SMR's are able to produce electricity continuously so are best suited
for base-load power.
Questions arise:
What are the advantages / disadvantages of creating
base-load electricity from multiple locations?
In the critical time gap between now and mature renewables around
***2040 is there even enough time to proto-type, test, manufacture
and install SMRs?
Would the move to SMRs make us dependent of foreign imports of
alloys, reactors and complex fuels? or Is there time to create a
domestic capability from scratch?
for the fast reactor designs would we be importing high level
radioactive waste to maximise reactor efficiencies?
*** assumes that by 2040 battery storage, pumped hydro or other storage
means are in place
In order for Australia to build and maintain its own SMRs and not be
reliant on foreign powers :
have transitioned from full-scale prototypes to ongoing commercial
SMRs
delivered using well-established domestic manufacturing facilities
and robust supply chains.
have on offer a choice of SMR systems from various established and
successful vendors.
developed the expertise to refine exotic alloys, test components;
construct, maintain and safely dispose of nuclear waste and
components at end of life
ability to make and recycle domestic nuclear fuels
provide transparent and proven capital and operating costs from
multiple operating vendors and sites.
demonstrate the operational safety and environmental performance
of SMRs in line with Australian society’s expectations.
require a suitably scaled nuclear-power qualified local skills
base.
Currently, none of these conditions exist in Australia.
Changes in National and State Legislation would be necessary...
Commonwealth law, under Section 140A of the Environment Protection and
Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act), creates a moratorium in
the construction and operation of nuclear power plants.
There is also moratorium legislation in Queensland, NSW and Victoria
Fastest option would be Boiling water or Pressurisd water designs as
these are the most advanced.
However both suffer from many of the same concerns the public has over
Large Scale Light Water facilities.
Gas, Molten Salt and Molten Metal designs with their high heat output an
fuel efficiencies are best for industrial applications / fuel
efficiencies but are currently the least developed designs.
It will likely take many years to design components, manufacture
components, test components, build proto-types, test to proto-types to
destruction, develop working models, test working models over periods of
time, develop factory style commercial fabrication facilities, deploy
SMRs. Say it takes two years at each of these stages then we are looking
at a very minimum of 20years to deployment - well past 2040.
The development / manufacture / recycling of complex fuel types creates
another unpredictable timeline on its own.
If we are looking for a base-load coal replacement solution to be in
place by 2030-2040 SMRs are not going to be a realistic choice.
SMRs into a mature renewables environment after 2040 would be
impractically expensive.